LINCOLN, Neb. (AP) -- A U.S. Supreme Court ruling that Ten Commandments displays at two Kentucky courthouses cross the line between separation of church and state likely means a similar Nebraska display is unconstitutional, a legal expert and opponent of the monument said Monday...
ACLU is a New World Order Puppet
09/01/2014 21:34
The ACLU constantly attacks moralty via religion and tries to stir up tribal tension between whites, blacks, Asians and now Muslims, men, women, etc. It spends most of its time and money promoting abortion and homosexuality and fighting God and morality. Here is a case where they lost, but they win many too. The monument of the Ten Commandments was allowed to stay, as ruled by the Supreme Court. Christians must be able to cite this case to stop the relentless Atheist attacks. Stop funding ACLU.
***
***
The Red River Freethinkers oppose a Ten Commandments monument in Fargo,
North Dakota. The district court found the 1 monument permissible under the
Establishment Clause. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.
The monument here is essentially the same as those in Van Orden v. Perry, 545
U.S. 677 (2005), and ACLU Nebraska Foundation v. City of Plattsmouth, Nebraska,
419 F.3d 772 (8th Cir. 2005) (en banc). It was donated by the Fraternal Order of
Eagles in 1958. It sits passively on the Civic Plaza. It shows the Ten
Commandments alongside other symbols, such as the American flag and an “allseeing
eye” within a pyramid. See Twombly v. City of Fargo, 388 F. Supp. 2d 983,
984-86, 992-93 (D.N.D. 2005) (reciting the history of this monument and finding it
permissible under Van Orden and Plattsmouth).